Profits Before People: Merck and Schering-Plough Caught Red handed

Emails between a Schering-Plough executive and the principle investigator of the trial were made public today by Sen. .  The emails reveal that the trial’s principal investigator perceived that the drugmakers were withholding unfavorable results about / () for non-scientific reasons.  (Surprise Surprise).  Instead of releasing the bad data, Sen. Grassley noted, /Schering-Plough went on a blitz to increase prescriptions. 

For example, Grassley reported that /Schering-Plough spent $3.5 million for the “49 plan,” a wine-and-dine blitz of physicians to increase the volume of / () prescriptions.  He also chided the ACC for issuing a statement asking for calm and encouraging doctors to continue to prescribe .  That statement was passed to each member of congress by /Schering-Plough.

Results 

The full results were released at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) meeting here yesterday, two years after data collection ended. The study found that patients randomized to / () had no significant benefit in atherosclerosis progression over alone. 

Popularity: 63% [?]

Post a Response


Breaking News | Consumer Fraud | Dangers to the Environment | Defective Drugs

Defective Medical Devices | Other Defective Products | Vaccines

© Copyright Defective Products Lawyer 2007. All rights reserved.

Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.

Attorney Advertising