Warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/pharmawa/public_html/wp-content/themes/canvas/functions/admin-hooks.php on line 160

What Is The Future Of Medtronic & The Spinal Fusion Market?

The recent controversy surrounding Medtronic Inc.’s Infuse bone graft is having some question what the future will hold for the company, and for the spinal fusion market.

First approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2002, Medtronic’s Infuse bone graft has been cleared for use in a type of spine surgery called anterior approach lumbar fusion, as well as two types of dental procedures. However, recent research has shown that Infuse, also known as recombinant human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 or BMP2, may increase the risk that patients will develop cancer and other serious side effects.

Concerns have also been raised about the Medtronic-funded clinical trials used to gain approval of Infuse, with some researchers charging that the studies downplayed serious complications associated with the bone growth protein.

Medtronic has also faced investigations launched by the U.S. Justice Department and the U.S. Senate Finance Committee over possible illegal promotion of Infuse for off-label uses, as well as a growing number of personal injury lawsuits filed by victims of alleged Infuse complications.

And, all of this controversy surrounding the medical device has caused the sales to continually and steadily decline, quarter after quarter, as doctors began limiting its use or abandoning it altogether.

In an effort to salvage the reputation of Infuse, Medtronic has commissioned Yale reviewers to conduct an independent review of the data related to Infuse. The review’s conclusions are eagerly awaited by Medtronic CEO Omar Ishrak who hopes that Infuse will be vindicated once and for all therebysilencing those who have raised questions about the safety of this blockbuster spinal fusion product.

But one research analyst who does not cover Medtronic believes that Infuse’s fortunes won’t rise even if Yale reviewers grant it a clean bill of health.

“Given that we’ve already had the proverbial eyebrow raised about Infuse, will (doctors) go back to it, I don’t think so,” said Caroline Corner, an analyst with investment bank MLV & Co.

So, what will happen with the future of the market?  The drop in the utilization rate of Infuse now leaves the door open for other companies trying to develop an alternative to Medtronic’s Infuse, Corner said.

According to a report from MedCityNews, while no product is currently available that could completely replace Infuse, there are a few that could come to be considered a next-best option.

These include Osteocel Plus sold by California firm NuVasive; Trinity Evolution, sold by Orthofix Biologics in Texas; and Vitoss sold by Pennsylvania firm Orthovita, now part of Stryker.

One product, called OsteoSponge, appears to be particularly promising, according to an analyst interviewed by MedCityNews. Made by Bacterin International, OsteoSponge performed well against Infuse in a small, head-to-head clinical trial. Not only did it perform as well as Infuse with none of the risks connected to the Medtronic product.  And, OsteoSponge costs about 1/3 less than it’s competitor. Caroline Corner, the analyst from MLV & Co., told MedCityNews that if OsteoSponge can do as well in a larger clinical trial, it could gain some of Infuse’s market share.



, , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

GET HELP NOW!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Latest Drug Injury News

Big Pharma under Fire for Kickbacks to Docs

Trust and honesty are the cornerstones to a doctor-patient relationship. With so many doctors receiving financial incentives to use certain medications or medical devices, patients need to know if money drives the decision making process. Doctors are required to disclose potential financial conflicts to each other at conferences, but there currently is no law forcing […]

Dietary Supplements Damage Liver

A recent study revealed a significant increase in liver damage related to dietary supplements. The study, conducted by a national network of liver specialists, found a 13% increase in serious liver damage over a 10 year span. Some of these patients required liver transplants and some have even died due to liver failure. Authors of […]

FDA Advisory Committee Supports Approval of Gilead’s HIV Reducing Drug

The pharmaceutical industry may be on the verge of one of the greatest breakthrough’s that this generation has ever seen.

U.S. Health Regulators Issue New Restrictions For Gilenya, Novartis AG’s’ Multiple Sclerosis Pill

In December 2011, the FDA issued a Drug Safety Communication concerning a patient with multiple sclerosis (MS) who died within 24 hours of taking the first dose of Gilenya (fingolimod).

Plavix Linked with Internal Bleeding

Ten more people have died from Plavix, which had proven to be no better than aspirin against stroke even though it costs around 100 times more.

Latest Medical Device Injury News

Report Raises Concerns Over Heart Defibrillator Leads

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has just announced that they received a report that a St. Jude Durata cardiac defibrillator lead conductor became externalized; meaning the wire carrying electricity from the heart defibrillator to the heart was exposed through its insulation, a potentially dangerous and life-threatening defect.

HeartSine Class 1 Defibrillator Recall

HeartSine sent out a letter to customers in September, warning that the defibrillators may intermittently turn on and off, eventually depleting the battery.

FDA Medical Device Approval Based On Little Evidence

More than half of the high-risk cardiovascular devices approved in the past decade had no supporting active control data.

St. Jude Medical Gets FDA Warning

St. Jude Medical Inc. said it received a FDA warning about manufacturing and quality-control problems at its Sylmar, California, plant.

Hospira Still Facing Manufacturing And Regulatory Issues

Hospira has sent out 11 device notifications so far in 2013, including recall and device corrections. The company also said it sent notices to customers about some of its infusion pumps that had to either be recalled, fixed or adjusted.